::. Back to Beyond the Box Index ::.

Vaccination - Deadly Immunity
by Robert F. Kennedy jnr


Below are excerpts with comments in blue from Michael Brine.

The full article can be read at the following site :


"The first step is to penetrate the clouds of deceit and distortion and learn the truth about the world, then to organize and act to change it. That's never been impossible and never been easy." Norm Chomsky.

"The damage caused by vaccine exposure is massive. It's bigger than asbestos, bigger than tobacco, bigger than anything you've ever seen!" - Robert Kennedy Jr.

Vaccination is a deadly issue. Deadly as in dead ! In the next two Friday's issues of this paper I am going to deal with this issue which unfortunatly, few if any in a responsible position,including particularly Health Canada and the mainstream media, are willing to listen to.

Indeed there are very real indicators that we should be taking a second look at just how effective this method of health "protection" truly is, and what,in fact,it has been doing, over successive generations, to our immune systems.

Let me start with some startling statistics based on US studies which will be much the same for Canadians:-

Over the last 25 years the number of doses of vaccine given to children has tripled. Here is a sample of how this breaks down:-

Children up to 6 - 48 doses of 14 different vaccines administered.
Up to 18 years - 67 doses of 15 different vaccines administered.

Now:- 1 in 6 children have learning disabilities.
1 in 9 have asthma.
1 in 100 to 150 have autism.
1 in 450 have diabetes.

In the past we had nothing like these diseases/illnesses but in the last 25 years all this has changed. The big question is WHY ?

A week or so ago I received a startling report written by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in which he exposes the real truth hidden in these murky waters covering this issue. What folows now and next Friday are extracts from his discoveries. This was very unsettling for him as he was in favour of vaccinations until this secret meeting he was invited to. He was not prepared to hear what he did engineered as it was by mainly the drug companies, and other affected parties. I'll let the following extracts from his report speak for themselves.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - "In June 2000, a group of top government scientists and health officials gathered for a meeting at the isolated Simpsonwood conference center in Norcross, Georgia, convened by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. To ensure complete secrecy the agency had issued no public announcement of the session ­ only private invitations to fifty-two attendees. There were high-level officials from the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the top vaccine specialist from the World Health Organization in Geneva and representatives of every major vaccine manufacturer. All of the scientific data under discussion, CDC officials repeatedly reminded the participants, was strictly “embargoed.” There would be no making photocopies of documents, no taking papers with them when they left.

The federal officials and industry representatives had assembled to discuss a disturbing new study that raised alarming questions about the safety of a host of common childhood vaccines administered to infants and young children. According to a CDC epidemiologist named Tom Verstraeten, who had analyzed the agency’s massive database containing the medical records of 100,000 children, a mercury-based preservative in the vaccines ­ Thimerosal ­ appeared to be responsible for a dramatic increase in autism and a host of other neurological disorders among children. “I was actually stunned by what I saw,” Verstraeten told those assembled at Simpsonwood, citing the staggering number of earlier studies that indicate a link between Thimerosal and speech delays, attention-deficit disorder, hyperactivity and autism. Since 1991, when the CDC and the FDA had recommended that three additional vaccines laced with the preservative be given to extremely young infants ­ in one case, within hours of birth ­ the estimated number of cases of autism had increased fifteenfold, FROM ONE IN 2500 CHILDREN TO 1 IN 166 CHILDREN!

Even for scientists and doctors accustomed to confronting issues of life and death, the findings were frightening. “You can play with this all you want,” Dr. Bill Weil, a consultant for the American Academy of Pediatrics, told the group. "The results “are statistically significant.”

But instead of taking immediate steps to alert the public and rid the vaccine supply of Thimerosal, the officials and executives at Simpsonwood spent most of the next two days discussing how to cover up the damaging data. According to transcripts obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, many at the meeting were concerned about how the damaging revelations about Thimerosal would affect the vaccine industry’s bottom line.

In fact the government has proved to be far more adept at handling the damage than at protecting children’s health. The CDC paid the Institute of Medicine to conduct a new study to whitewash the risks of Thimerosal, ordering researchers to “rule out” the chemical’s link to autism. It withheld Verstraeten’s findings, even though they had been slated for immediate publication, and told other scientists that his original data had been “lost” and could not be replicated. And to thwart the Freedom of Information Act, it handed its giant database of vaccine records over to a private company, declaring it off-limits to researchers. By the time Verstraeten finally published his study in 2003, he had gone to work for GlaxoSmithKline and reworked his data to bury the link between Thimerosal and autism.

Vaccine manufacturers had already begun to phase Thimerosal out of injections given to American infants ­ but they continued to sell off their mercury-based supplies of vaccines until last year. The CDC and FDA gave them a hand, buying up the tainted vaccines for export to developing countries and allowing drug companies to continue using the preservative in some American vaccines ­ including several pediatric flu shots as well as tetanus boosters routinely given to eleven-year-olds.

The drug companies are also getting help from powerful lawmakers in Washington. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, who has received $873,000 in contributions from the pharmaceutical industry, has been working to immunize vaccine makers from liability in 4,200 lawsuits that have been filed by the parents of injured children. On five separate occasions, Frist has tried to seal all of the government’s vaccine-related documents ­ including the Simpsonwood transcripts ­ and shield Eli Lilly, the developer of Thimerosal, from subpoenas. In 2002, the day after Frist quietly slipped a rider known as the “Eli Lilly Protection Act” into a homeland security bill, the company contributed $10,000 to his campaign and bought 5,000 copies of his book on bioterrorism. The measure was repealed by Congress in 2003 ­ but earlier this year, Frist slipped another provision into an anti-terrorism bill that would deny compensation to children suffering from vaccine-related brain disorders. “The lawsuits are of such magnitude that they could put vaccine producers out of business and limit our capacity to deal with a biological attack by terrorists,” says Dean Rosen, health policy adviser to Frist.

Even many conservatives are shocked by the government’s effort to cover up the dangers of Thimerosal. Rep. Dan Burton, a Republican from Indiana, oversaw a three-year investigation of Thimerosal after his grandson was diagnosed with autism. “Thimerosal used as a preservative in vaccines is directly related to the autism epidemic,” his House Government Reform Committee concluded in its final report. “This epidemic in all probability may have been prevented or curtailed had the FDA not been asleep at the switch regarding a lack of safety data regarding injected Thimerosal, a known neurotoxin.” The FDA and other public-health agencies failed to act, the committee added, out of “institutional malfeasance for self protection” and “misplaced protectionism of the pharmaceutical industry.”

The story of how government health agencies colluded with Big Pharma to hide the risks of Thimerosal from the public is a chilling case study of institutional arrogance, power and greed. I was drawn into the controversy only reluctantly. As an attorney and environmentalist who has spent years working on issues of mercury toxicity, I frequently met mothers of autistic children who were absolutely convinced that their kids had been injured by vaccines. Privately, I was skeptical.

It was only after reading the Simpsonwood transcripts, studying the leading scientific research and talking with many of the nation’s pre-eminent authorities on mercury that I became convinced that the link between Thimerosal and the epidemic of childhood neurological disorders is real. Five of my own children are members of the Thimerosal Generation ­ those born between 1989 and 2003 ­ who received heavy doses of mercury from vaccines. “The elementary grades are overwhelmed with children who have symptoms of neurological or immune-system damage,” Patti White, a school nurse, told the House Government Reform Committee in 1999. “Vaccines are supposed to be making us healthier; however, in twenty-five years of nursing I have never seen so many damaged, sick kids. Something very, very wrong is happening to our children.”

More than 500,000 kids currently suffer from autism, and pediatricians diagnose more than 40,000 new cases every year. The disease was unknown until 1943, when it was identified and diagnosed among eleven children born in the months after Thimerosal was first added to baby vaccines in 1931.

Some skeptics dispute that the rise in autism is caused by Thimerosal-tainted vaccinations. They argue that the increase is a result of better diagnosis ­ a theory that seems questionable at best, given that most of the new cases of autism are clustered within a single generation of children. “If the epidemic is truly an artifact of poor diagnosis,” scoffs Dr. Boyd Haley, one of the world’s authorities on mercury toxicity, “then where are all the twenty-year-old autistics?” Other researchers point out that Americans are exposed to a greater cumulative “load” of mercury than ever before, from contaminated fish to dental fillings, and suggest that Thimerosal in vaccines may be only part of a much larger problem. It’s a concern that certainly deserves far more attention than it has received ­ but it overlooks the fact that the mercury concentrations in vaccines dwarf other sources of exposure to our children.

What is most striking is the lengths to which many of the leading detectives have gone to ignore ­ and cover up ­ the evidence against Thimerosal. From the very beginning, the scientific case against the mercury additive has been overwhelming. The preservative, which is used to stem fungi and bacterial growth in vaccines, contains ethylmercury, a potent neurotoxin. Truckloads of studies have shown that mercury tends to accumulate in the brains of primates and other animals after they are injected with vaccines ­ and that the developing brains of infants are particularly susceptible. In 1977, a Russian study found that adults exposed to much lower concentrations of ethylmercury than those given to American children still suffered brain damage years later. Russia banned Thimerosal from children’s vaccines twenty years ago, and Denmark, Austria, Japan, Great Britain and all the Scandinavian countries have since followed suit.

“You couldn’t even construct a study that shows Thimerosal is safe,” says Haley, who heads the chemistry department at the University of Kentucky. “It’s just too darn toxic. If you inject Thimerosal into an animal, its brain will sicken. If you apply it to living tissue, the cells die. If you put it in a petri dish, the culture dies. Knowing these things, it would be shocking if one could inject it into an infant without causing damage.”

Internal documents reveal that Eli Lilly, which first developed Thimerosal, knew from the start that its product could cause damage ­ and even death ­ in both animals and humans. In 1930, the company tested Thimerosal by administering it to twenty-two patients with terminal meningitis, all of whom died within weeks of being injected ­ a fact Lilly didn’t bother to report in its study declaring Thimerosal safe. In 1935, researchers at another vaccine manufacturer, Pittman-Moore, warned Lilly that its claims about Thimerosal’s safety “did not check with ours.” Half the dogs Pittman injected with Thimerosal-based vaccines became sick, leading researchers there to declare the preservative “unsatisfactory as a serum intended for use on dogs.”

"Where is wisdom lost in knowledge, and where is knowledge lost in MIS-information" [with apologies to T.S. Elliott]

"The damage caused by vaccine exposure is massive. It's bigger than asbestos, bigger than tobacco, bigger than anything you've ever seen!" Robert F.Kennedy Jr.

When the truth finally emerges will history record that vaccination has been the largest mass murder ever perpetrated on Humanity?

Indeed, is this just about money or an insidious way, introduced several generations ago, in which to control global populations which, admittedly, are approaching critical levels? I have heard this stunning suggestion by intelligent and informed individuals over the years who I am not prepared to just dismiss as cranks! Personally, I am not sure but there is some pretty convincing evidence to suggest that it was. Regardless --------

Consider - Once "respectively" introduced into "Mainstream" thinking as it was eighty or so years ago, it has become part of our conditioned thinking ever since which few subsequently ever think to seriously question. It stands to reason when we are born into a culture or society as we grow up we quite naturally tend to accept their ways of thinking. So it has been with this issue of vaccination - until now.

Well, after my two near death experiences caused from vaccination I am - and believe me so are many others - questioning. One problem is that the main stream media still won't touch it - [my Editor is a commendable exception!].One has to ask why? What are they afraid of? Isn't it the media's job to present both sides of an issue? Are they being muzzled by some "authority[ies]" further up the line - Or, just so conditioned that any questioning by ordinary non-medical citizens is considered ridiculous? Let me tell you there are an increasing number of doctors who are questiong it! Check the internet.

Now, lets get back to more of this report I quoted from in Part One, by Robert Kennedy Jr.:-

"In the decades that followed, the evidence against Thimerosal continued to mount. During the Second World War, when the Department of Defense used the preservative in vaccines on soldiers, it required Lilly to label it “poison.” In 1967, a study in Applied Microbiology found that Thimerosal killed mice when added to injected vaccines. Four years later, Lilly's own studies discerned that Thimerosal was “toxic to tissue cells” in concentrations as low as one part per million ­ 100 times weaker than the concentration in a typical vaccine. Even so, the company continued to promote Thimerosal as “nontoxic” and also incorporated it into topical disinfectants. In 1977, ten babies at a Toronto hospital died when an antiseptic preserved with Thimerosal was dabbed onto their umbilical cords.

In 1982, the FDA proposed a ban on over-the-counter products that contained Thimerosal, and in 1991 the agency considered banning it from animal vaccines. But tragically, that same year, the CDC recommended that infants be injected with a series of mercury-laced vaccines. Newborns would be vaccinated for hepatitis B within twenty-four hours of birth, and two-month-old infants would be immunized for haemophilus influenzae B and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis.

The drug industry knew the additional vaccines posed a danger. The same year that the CDC approved the new vaccines, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, one of the fathers of Merck's vaccine programs, warned the company that six-month-olds who were administered the shots would suffer dangerous exposure to mercury. He recommended that Thimerosal be discontinued, “especially when used on infants and children,” noting that THE INDUSTRY KNEW Of NONTOXIC ALTERNATIVES! “The best way to go,” he added, “is to switch to dispensing the actual vaccines without adding preservatives.”

For Merck and other drug companies, however, the obstacle was money. Thimerosal enables the pharmaceutical industry to package vaccines in vials that contain multiple doses, which require additional protection because they are more easily contaminated by multiple needle entries. The larger vials cost half as much to produce as smaller, single-dose vials, making it cheaper for international agencies to distribute them to impoverished regions at risk of epidemics. Faced with this “cost consideration,” Merck ignored Hilleman's warnings, and government officials continued to push more and more Thimerosal-based vaccines for children. Before 1989, American preschoolers received eleven vaccinations ­ for polio, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and measles-mumps-rubella. A decade later, thanks to federal recommendations, children were receiving a total of twenty-two immunizations by the time they reached first grade.

As the number of vaccines increased, the rate of autism among children exploded. During the 1990s, 40 million children were injected with Thimerosal-based vaccines, receiving unprecedented levels of mercury during a period critical for brain development. Despite the well-documented dangers of Thimerosal, it appears that no one bothered to add up the cumulative dose of mercury that children would receive from the mandated vaccines.

At two months, when the infant brain is still at a critical stage of development, infants routinely received three inoculations that contained a total of 62.5 micrograms of ethylmercury ­ a level 99 times greater than the EPA's limit for daily exposure to methylmercury, a related neurotoxin. Although the vaccine industry insists that ethylmercury poses little danger because it breaks down rapidly and is removed by the body, several studies ­ including one published in April by the National Institutes of Health ­ suggest that ethylmercury is actually more toxic to developing brains and stays in the brain longer than methylmercury.

W hile public-health officials may have been well-intentioned, many of those on the CDC advisory committee who backed the additional vaccines had close ties to the industry.

Indeed, in the tight circle of scientists who work on vaccines, such conflicts of interest are common. Rep. Burton says that the CDC “routinely allows scientists with blatant conflicts of interest to serve on intellectual advisory committees that make recommendations on new vaccines,” even though they have “interests in the products and companies for which they are supposed to be providing unbiased oversight.” The House Government Reform Committee discovered that four of the eight CDC advisers who approved guidelines for a rotavirus vaccine “had financial ties to the pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine.”

Offit, who shares a patent on one of the vaccines, acknowledged to me that he “would make money” if his vote eventually leads to a marketable product. But he dismissed my suggestion that a scientist's direct financial stake in CDC approval might bias his judgment.

Other vaccine scientists and regulators gave me similar assurances. Like Offit, they view themselves as enlightened guardians of children's health, proud of their “partnerships” with pharmaceutical companies, immune to the seductions of personal profit, besieged by irrational activists whose anti-vaccine campaigns are endangering children's health. They are often resentful of questioning.

Some government officials were alarmed by the apparent conflicts of interest. In his e-mail to CDC administrators in 1999, Paul Patriarca of the FDA blasted federal regulators for failing to adequately scrutinize the danger posed by the added baby vaccines. The close ties between regulatory officials and the pharmaceutical industry,will raise questions about various advisory bodies regarding aggressive recommendations for use of Thimerosal in child vaccines.

If federal regulators and government scientists failed to grasp the potential risks of Thimerosal over the years, no one could claim ignorance after the secret meeting at Simpsonwood. But rather than conduct more studies to test the link to autism and other forms of brain damage, the CDC placed politics over science.

For those who had devoted their lives to promoting vaccination, the revelations about Thimerosal threatened to undermine everything they had worked for. “We've got a dragon by the tail here,” said Dr. Michael Kaback, another committee member.

Since August 2002, when members of Congress pressured the agency to turn over the data, the Geiers have completed six studies that demonstrate a powerful correlation between Thimerosal and neurological damage in children. One study, which compares the cumulative dose of mercury received by children born between 1981 and 1985 with those born between 1990 and 1996, found a “very significant relationship” between autism and vaccines. Another study of educational performance found that kids who received higher doses of Thimerosal in vaccines were nearly three times as likely to be diagnosed with autism and more than three times as likely to suffer from speech disorders and mental retardation.

As the federal government worked to prevent scientists from studying vaccines, others have stepped in to study the link to autism. In April, reporter Dan Olmsted of UPI undertook one of the more interesting studies himself. Searching for children who had not been exposed to mercury in vaccines ­ the kind of population that scientists typically use as a “control” in experiments ­ Olmsted scoured the Amish of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, who refuse to immunize their infants. Given the national rate of autism, Olmsted calculated that there should be 130 autistics among the Amish. He found only four. One had been exposed to high levels of mercury from a power plant. The other three ­ including one child adopted from outside the Amish community ­ had received their vaccines.

 “After three years of review, I became convinced there was sufficient credible research to show a link between mercury and the increased incidences in autism,” says state Sen. Ken Veenstra, a Republican who oversaw the investigation. “The fact that Iowa's 700 percent increase in autism began in the 1990s, right after more and more vaccines were added to the children's vaccine schedules, is solid evidence alone.” Last year, Iowa became the first state to ban mercury in vaccines, followed by California. Similar bans are now under consideration in thirty-two other states.

Instead of following suit, the FDA continues to allow manufacturers to include Thimerosal in scores of over-the-counter medications as well as steroids and injected collagen. Even more alarming, the government continues to ship vaccines preserved with Thimerosal to developing countries ­ some of which are now experiencing a sudden explosion in autism rates. In China, where the disease was virtually unknown prior to the introduction of Thimerosal by U.S. drug manufacturers in 1999, news reports indicate that there are now more than 1.8 million autistics.

I devoted time to study this issue because I believe that this is a moral crisis that must be addressed. If, as the evidence suggests, our public-health authorities knowingly allowed the pharmaceutical industry to poison an entire generation of American children, their actions arguably constitute one of the biggest scandals in the annals of American medicine.

It's hard to calculate the damage to our country ­ and to the international efforts to eradicate epidemic diseases ­ if Third World nations come to believe that America's most heralded foreign-aid initiative is poisoning their children. It's not difficult to predict how this scenario will be interpreted by America's enemies abroad. The scientists and researchers ­ many of them sincere, even idealistic ­ who are participating in efforts to hide the science on Thimerosal claim that they are trying to advance the lofty goal of protecting children in developing nations from disease pandemics. They are badly misguided. Their failure to come clean on Thimerosal will come back horribly to haunt our country and the world's poorest populations."

 This exposure about the link between mercury in vaccines and the dramatic rise in autism among children  sparked intense reaction from the medical establishment and several leading news organizations.

The government's own records show that it has failed to do the science necessary to put to rest reasonable concerns about vaccines. If the scientists had simply done their job rather than covering their tracks, there would be no controversy today. Instead, the government cannot even provide a definitive figure of the number of cases of autism among American children ­ a number obviously critical to any serious scientific investigation ­ and yet expects the public to believe that it has ruled out any link between vaccines and an illness it does not even track."

Thank you Robert Kennedy Jr. for your courage to speak out!

Now let me add that even in Canada there is a much too close an association between the Drug Industry and certain Government departments, particularly Health Canada, and of course our doctors - however well meaning. We are all the result of accepting what we are told by "Authorities". However, to be able to have the freedom to make intelligent decisions we first need to be informed without the bias of those who benefit financially. That in itself is a sad statement.

It is certainly believed by many sources that there is a hidden agenda behind governments and the World Health Organisation wanting to vaccinate their populations.

These "sanctioned" drug companies are the true "Drug Lords" masquarading as our "Saviours" and who our "Authorities" - should be exposing to be seen for what they truly are - and what they are doing to those who dutifully submit to these 'criminals' - but as usual all of this will sadly fall on deaf ears and we will continue to loose our loved ones to this disgusting and blind criminal greed.

Like many others around the world I have tried to 'blow the horn' but we get smothered by more important issues - like the latest info. on when the H1N1 vaccine will be ready.

Thank you for taking the time to read this. Good luck and most importantly "Good Health"- and if you agree with what has been exposed here please speak out. Do not be intimadated! It is truly a matter that is causing great harm to those we love - It is potentially a matter of life and death!
In closing I must express my deep appreciation to my Editor - Jim Butler - who with the Star's owner - Jackie  Pierce - have the guts to do what other news organisations are supposed to do - present differing view points on important issues, and not be controlle by those "Set in Authority over them" ! Thank you Jim. Thank you Jackie.

Thank you. Michael.

Previous columns by this writer may be accessed at click on “Beyond the Box”

::. Go To Beyond the Box #026 ::.

::. Back to Beyond the Box Index ::.


Untitled Document

                                                                    Web Design by